Full Article:
Contracts often contain provisions that make a party’s obligations dependent on a specific event, which can alter the responsibilities of those involved. A specific type of these provisions is known as a condition precedent. This article explores this concept and how it is interpreted under New York law.
Understanding Condition Precedent
A condition precedent is an event that must happen before a contract becomes effective or before a party is required to perform their side of the bargain. If the specified condition is not met, the corresponding duty under the contract does not arise. This mechanism allows parties to manage risk by ensuring that certain requirements are satisfied before they are bound to perform.
For example, a company might agree to purchase goods, but only if it first secures a loan to pay for them. The act of securing the loan is the condition precedent, and without it, the company’s obligation to buy the goods never materializes.
New York Law on Conditions Precedent
New York courts define a condition precedent as an act or event that must occur before a duty to perform a promise arises. This definition comes from cases like Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., which established that such conditions must be literally performed.1Justia. Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim :: 1995 :: New York Court of Appeals Decisions Substantial performance is not enough to satisfy an express condition precedent; the requirement must be met exactly as stated in the agreement.
However, courts recognize that requiring strict compliance can lead to forfeiture, where one party loses all its contractual rights. To avoid this, New York law prefers to interpret ambiguous contractual language as a promise rather than a condition precedent. If the language is not clear, a court is more likely to find that a party promised to do something, making them liable for damages if they fail, rather than finding that the entire contract is void because a condition was not met.
This judicial preference means that for a provision to be treated as a condition precedent, it must be stated in clear and unmistakable terms, as the intent must be explicit.
Examples of Conditions Precedent
In real estate transactions, a common example is a buyer’s obligation to purchase a home being contingent upon securing a mortgage. If the buyer is unable to get loan approval from a bank after making a good faith effort, the condition is not met, and the buyer is released from the obligation to purchase the property without penalty.
Another frequent use is in employment agreements where an offer may be conditional upon the successful completion of a background check. If the prospective employee fails the background check, the condition precedent is not satisfied, and the employer’s obligation to hire that individual is extinguished.
In business mergers and acquisitions, an agreement might be subject to shareholder approval or regulatory consent. For instance, a deal might state it is conditional upon receiving approval from the Department of Justice. Should that approval be denied, the entire merger agreement may become void.
Language Creating Conditions Precedent
The specific words used in a contract are important for creating a condition precedent. New York courts look for clear language indicating the parties’ intent. Using terms that signal the parties have agreed to suspend an obligation until a specific event occurs is key. Phrases often considered indicators of a condition include:
- If
- Provided that
- On condition that
- Subject to
- Unless and until
Ambiguous phrasing can lead to disputes where one party believes a condition exists and the other does not. For example, the phrase “if the buyer obtains financing, then the seller will transfer the property” clearly establishes a condition. In contrast, a vaguer statement might be interpreted by a court as a mere promise, not a condition that invalidates the contract if unmet.
Consequences of an Unmet Condition Precedent
When a condition precedent is not met, the primary consequence is that the corresponding contractual duty does not become active. The party whose performance was contingent on the condition is discharged from their obligation. This does not necessarily mean the entire contract is void, but the specific duties attached to the failed condition are not enforceable.
For instance, if a painter’s contract to paint a building is “subject to” the building owner obtaining all necessary permits by a certain date, and the owner fails to do so, the painter is no longer obligated to paint.
In some cases, the failure of a condition precedent can lead to the termination of the entire contract. This often happens when the condition is fundamental to the agreement, such as the financing contingency in a real estate sale. If the condition is not fulfilled, the affected party has the right to walk away from the deal without further liability.